In today’s digital landscape, network security has become more critical and complex than ever before. Traditional perimeter-based security models are no longer sufficient to protect against modern cyber threats, especially with the rise of remote work, cloud services, and mobile devices. As a result, organizations are increasingly turning to advanced security models such as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE), and Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) to secure their data, users, and networks. SASE should not be confused with SSE (Security Services Edge). The difference between SASE and SSE lies in their approach to security, with SASE combining network functions with security, while SSE focuses solely on security services for cloud-based applications.

Each of these models offers unique advantages, but they also serve different purposes. In this blog, we’ll explore the 7 key differences between ZTNA, SASE, and CASB that you need to know to make informed decisions for your organization’s cybersecurity strategy.

1. Primary Function and Focus

• ZTNA: The primary function of ZTNA is to control access to applications and resources based on the principle of zero trust like zero trust architecture. ZTNA verifies the identity of users and devices before granting access, regardless of their location. The focus is on securing access to specific applications, rather than the entire network.
• SASE: SASE, on the other hand, is a broader security framework that combines networking and security services into a single cloud-delivered model. It aims to provide secure access to all users and devices, no matter where they are located. The focus of SASE is to optimize both network performance and security through a unified platform.
• CASB: The CASB meaning refers to Cloud Access Security Broker, a solution that acts as an intermediary between users and cloud service providers to enforce security policies. CASB is designed to secure cloud services and applications by acting as an intermediary between users and cloud platforms. When comparing CASB vs SASE, one understands that CASB enforces security policies, ensures compliance, and protects sensitive data as it moves between on-premises systems and cloud services.

2. Architecture

• ZTNA: ZTNA solutions can be deployed as either cloud-based services or on-premises appliances. The architecture typically involves a broker or gateway that mediates access requests between users and applications. ZTNA solutions can be either agent-based (requiring software on user devices) or agentless.
• SASE: SASE is inherently cloud-native. It integrates multiple security functions, such as secure web gateways (SWG), firewalls, and ZTNA, into a distributed cloud infrastructure. This cloud-based architecture provides scalability, flexibility, and centralized management for securing remote and hybrid environments.
• CASB: In the context of cloud services, the CASB security meaning relates to securing data access, preventing unauthorized actions, and ensuring compliance with cloud application usage. CASB operates as a cloud-based security service, positioned between users and cloud applications. It monitors and controls cloud traffic, providing visibility into cloud usage and enforcing security policies. CASB can be deployed in four modes: API-based, reverse proxy, forward proxy, or inline.

3. Deployment Models

• ZTNA: ZTNA integration can be handled in several ways, depending on the solution. Agent-based ZTNA requires client software to be installed on devices, while agentless ZTNA works via web-based access controls. It can be delivered through cloud services or via on-premises appliances.
• SASE: SASE is delivered as a cloud-native solution that integrates multiple security and networking functions, such as SD-WAN, ZTNA, and secure web gateways. This allows organizations to deliver consistent security policies across remote users, branch offices, and cloud environments.
• CASB: CASB is typically delivered as a cloud service that integrates with an organization’s existing infrastructure. It can be deployed using APIs for cloud-to-cloud communication, or through proxy-based models that intercept cloud traffic.

4. Scope of Security

• ZTNA: ZTNA focuses primarily on securing access to specific applications or resources. It operates under the assumption that no one should be trusted by default, even if they are inside the network. Each user or device must be verified before being granted access, and the access is limited to the specific resources they need.
• SASE: SASE offers a broader scope of security by combining multiple security services, including ZTNA, firewall as a service (FWaaS), secure web gateways (SWG), and data loss prevention (DLP). It provides end-to-end security, from the device to the cloud, for all types of users and devices, across different locations.
• CASB: CASB is focused on securing cloud services and applications. It provides visibility into cloud usage, enforces security policies, and protects data moving between on-premises systems and the cloud. When comparing a secure web gateway vs CASB, it’s essential to understand that a secure web gateway focuses on filtering web traffic, while a CASB adds more layers of control over cloud applications and data. CASB is designed to handle the specific security challenges that arise from using Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications.

5. Data Protection

• ZTNA: ZTNA does not directly focus on data protection but rather on controlling access to resources. By limiting access to specific applications, ZTNA helps prevent unauthorized users from accessing sensitive data.
• SASE: SASE provides comprehensive data protection through integrated security functions like DLP, encryption, and threat protection. By consolidating multiple security services into a single platform, SASE ensures that data is protected throughout the network and in the cloud.
• CASB: Data protection is a core function of CASB. It monitors and controls data as it moves between users and cloud services, applying encryption, tokenization, and other security measures to protect sensitive information. CASB also helps organizations comply with data privacy regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA.

6. Visibility and Control

• ZTNA: ZTNA provides granular control over who can access specific applications, but it does not offer the same level of visibility into overall network activity as other solutions like SASE or CASB.
• SASE: SASE offers extensive visibility into network traffic, user activity, and security events. Because it integrates multiple security services into a single platform, SASE provides centralized control and monitoring across the entire network, whether on-premises or in the cloud.
• CASB: CASB offers detailed visibility into cloud usage, including which applications are being used, who is accessing them, and what data is being shared. CASB allows organizations to monitor cloud activity and enforce security policies for all cloud services.

7. Use Cases

• ZTNA: ZTNA is ideal for organizations that want to secure access to specific applications or resources, especially in remote work environments. It is commonly used to prevent lateral movement within the network and to protect sensitive data by controlling application-specific access.
• SASE: SASE is best suited for organizations with distributed networks, remote workers, and a heavy reliance on cloud services. It is ideal for companies that need to optimize network performance while enforcing consistent security policies across different locations and devices.
• CASB: CASB is designed for organizations that use a mix of on-premises and cloud applications. It is particularly useful for securing cloud storage and collaboration tools like Google Drive, Dropbox, and Office 365, as well as ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations.

Conclusion

ZTNA, SASE, and CASB each have their strengths and are suited to different aspects of modern network security. The debate of ZTNA vs SASE often comes down to ZTNA focusing on securing user access at a granular level, while SASE provides a broader, integrated network and security model. CASB is tailored to securing cloud services. Companies looking for the best SASE solutions often evaluate platforms for their comprehensive network and security integration. By understanding the key differences between these security models, organizations can choose the right solutions to protect their networks, data, and users in today’s complex digital landscape. For businesses managing hybrid cloud environments and remote workers, leveraging these security frameworks is essential to minimize risks and ensure consistent protection.

Ensure your organization’s cloud infrastructure is protected with Trio’s comprehensive Mobile Device Management (MDM) solution. Manage, monitor, and secure all devices across your network with ease. Start a free trial today and take control of your security posture before threats become reality.